Sign In Now ►
or Create A New Account ►
Rank This Matchup or Comment/Reply Below
If I could repeat this choice a thousand times, I would. 1971, 1971, a thousand times 1971.
Gotta go with Gene Wilder's Wonka. Less menacing, more humorous. And no daddy issues.
The remake sucks!!!!!! Bad!!!!!!!!!!
The original, no contest. The music is just catchy and amazing and the colours used are abstract and fun.
Gene Wilder > Johnny Depp
I echo the sentiment of the user above me. And the Oompa Loompas in the remake. Don't get me started.
If anyone in the world prefers the Burton version, I never want to meet them. I love Depp, but his Michael Jackson-like Wonka is just creepy and not at all what Roald Dahl had in mind when he wrote it. Gene Wilder made this role impossible for anyone else to take on in years to come.
I honestly don't think there's anyone in the world who would prefer Burton's version over the original. That's crazy talk. The sense of wonder and emotion from the original was stripped down in Burton's version and replaced with a creepy Michael Jackson character and awkward moments.
I was scared by the 1971 version, so there is no competition for me!
As a kid, I loved the book. Since Burton's version more accurately portrays the story of the book, I have to go with Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.
Gene Wilder is the preferable Willie Wonka. Tim Burton's version is kind of mean and reminded me of Michael Jackson and Neverland.
Original. Liked better the Gene Wilder Willy Wonka than Johny Depp's.
I never liked the original version, Burtons movie is much more colorful and more freaky
Is it strange that I find them both really, really, creepy?
Your a loser "Marvelboy888".
You don't even deserve to rank this.
Grow a pair!
Really quickly, I will say that I really liked Freddie Highmore as Charlie Bucket in the Burton film, probably better than the original. The other kids were quite good. But Gene Wilder's Willy Wonka absolutely blows Depp's out of the water. And the father/dentist backstory was just silly.
Ugh, sucky remake 101.
At long last, these two up against each other. While I thought the 2005 version was a fun movie, there simply is no beating the classic Gene Wilder as Willy Wonka.
What's with all the hate on the 2005 one? It's not a bad movie! Even if I do prefer the 1971 version, I still love Tim Burton's adaptation, it was very unique.
I like the remake but I have to go with the original.
The original. Better acting and more layered characters.
Old Willy Wonka easily. Even though it's more true to the book, it feels like every other Tim Burton movie that he does with Depp
Johnny Depp = pedophile. That's what C&CF taught me, meanwhile Gene Wilder was brilliantly deadpan. What an awesome film. ...no contest
Wilder is classic in the original. Depp just felt contrived and silly and acted like a 5 year old. Wilder was truly amazing. And the boat scene in the original is great.
The original, by far!! It's superior in every way, especially the casting, music, story, visuals and atmosphere. Burton's version was awful. A completely unnecessary remake. He sucked all the charm out of the Oompa Loompas. The songs weren't memorable. And Gene Wilder's Wonka beats Johnny Depp's any day of the week. Depp was plain weird, but Wilder was more subtly creepy, menacing and intriguing. The 1971 movie more accurately captures the spirit of the book, especially it's charm and humour.
Excellent matchup for debate here! Incidentally Jeremy James-Taylor, Tim Burton's Casting agent visited our school to try and find people to play Charlie and Veruca but he only talked to short people since most of us were too old. Anyway, I was impressed (for the most part) by how faithful the new version was to the book in comparison to the old version, but the old version captured the essence and spirit of the book much better. Tim Burton's film is far too Tim Burton-esque for my liking, plus the whole subplot about Willy Wonka's father was completely phoned in and the idea of Willy Wonka being some sort of Michael Jackson character (though hating children too much rather than loving them too much) did NOT fit the film at all. So for me, it has to be the original; a classic film growing up, one of my favourite family films as a child.
The original, not even close. Charlie isn't a bad version of the story but Johnny Depp just doesn't compare to Gene Wilder.
I'm pretty sure that most of the people who will pick the original are probably old folks who have seen it as children growing up and therefore have a strong sentimental connection with it. But the author of the book, Roald Dahl, said that they ruined his book with Willy Wonka. I'm a weird dude who's a Tim Burton fan so of course I think Charlie should win. Its more freaky and true to the original story. More creative. Better songs.
The remake by a mile. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is one of the most joyously weird and hilarious films I've ever had the pleasure of seeing with gorgeous special effects, great acting (including my personal favorite performance from Depp), and marvelous songs written by Dahl himself. The original is fine, but unspectacular. Certainly no where near the genius remake.
Idk, the classic
damn i think i'll go with tim burton on this one only because it's the first one i saw and enjoyed as a kid
Willy not Charlie but Willy
1971 Willy Wonka is a classic. 2005 Charlie was just awful.
Willy. Wilder > Depp
I like that Dahl's original lyrics were used for the songs in the Burton version, and that's the only positive thing I have to say about it. It was totally charmless, and Depp was a terrible Wonka.
Yes it is true that author Roald Dahl didn't like Gene Wilder's interpretation of the beloved Willy Wonka, and yes Tim Burton kept to the original Dahl story, however Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory is a far superior film in almost every way possible including character development, pace of story, music score, and even the set was more visually appealing.
Charlie and the Chocolate Factory all the way. (i like both tho)