Saw II vs. Saw III

7 comments

4 comments

Definitely Saw II...Saw III was the beginning of taking it too far.

Saw III had a much stronger story. II was great for Tobin Bell's performance but a lot of it was style over substance.

Anyone know the difference? No really.

Tobin Bell's awesome performance wins it for II.

Saw III is only eclipsed the original.

Saw II is the second best in the series (after the original of course) in my opinion, and I love it. In Saw III, I really hate Jeff, the lead victim, and the way it knocks Amanda back down after building her up so beautifully for two films.

Saw II could be the best movie was made but it's even selliment casting throuth of sclats upsated Saw 3 was preatty much simple way of ouner to due view some ways

SAW 2 had better kills for me 3 had the stronger story this is hard but in saying SAW 2.

I actually prefer the 2nd one for the story. The 3rd seemed too obvious on how it was going to end. Saw II I felt I had no clue what was going to happen. I think it intrigued me more because of so.

Definitely Saw III, for me!

Parts of II interest me more but the overall story and relationships in III make it the winner.