Thor vs. V for Vendetta

3 comments

3 comments

Natalie Portman sure upgraded when she went from V to Thor. Thor is a great film on many levels. V is a piece of crap pretending to be something more.

V for Vendetta, easily. Portman is actually given some dimensions in this film and it manages to give some real depth to the issues presented. Plus, no annoying side characters (i.e. Warriors 3).

Thor smashes V. Thor was fun, exciting time at the movies, while Vendetta was an attempt to make you look at the deeper meaning. Just didn't work for me.

Thor was kinda average. I don't know if there was even an attepmt to make it anything but average, so maybe in some some regard it is a success. V For V starts out really well and then slides into mediocrity.

Liked Thor. V wins 3-2

Thor is fun but ultimately barely above average. V had problems but is overall done much better than Thor.

ear
ear

V was far superior on every level.