Spider-Man 2 vs. Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones

5 comments

3 comments

on 7/30/2009

Blech. The bad sequel, or an abysmal darth vader? Ugh, I guess spiderman.

JRM
JRM

on 5/7/2010

Spider-Man 2 was far superior than the original, imo. And Attack of the Clones was a lot of fun. I'll go with Spider-Man 2.

on 1/6/2013

Attack of the Clones.

on 1/6/2013

"The bad sequel" Say whaaat? "Attack of the Clones." Say whaaat?

on 1/6/2013

Spider-Man, Spider-Man, the sequel is good, go with that. (Too lazy to come up with something catchier. Anyway, Attack of the Clones ain't good.)

on 1/6/2013

Remember that very brief, very slight Evil Dead homage early on in Spiderman 2 that kinda hinted that Raimi would let his personality seep into the film a bit? And then he didn't?

on 1/7/2013

Attack of the Clones

on 1/7/2013

Attack of the Clones is a very poor movie, but I've only seen Spider-Man 2 once, and I've seen Attack of the Clones several times (perhaps in an effort to autopsy its awfulness). The guy here does a good job of deconstructing it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfBhi6qqFLA

on 1/7/2013

This is like choosing between a fine steak dinner or being waterboarded to death.

on 2/9/2013

Attack of the Clones is a very bad CGI Crap movie. So Spider-Man 2 wins this time.