Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End vs. Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones

2 comments

6 comments

on 8/4/2011

ugh. two terrible sequels. i wish there was a "pass" button

on 8/4/2011

Both of these movies can kiss my left nut. I don't know which I hate more, but I'm sure when I hit "Submit Comment," Flickchart will pick one for me. My guess is that Pirates is higher on my chart, because man, there is some all-time awful acting in Hayden Christensen's "performance."

on 10/7/2011

If you dress up like a CLOWN and put GLASSES on your dick to read a BOOK under WATER during a time travel in Bahamas at the Medieval Era, it will make more sense than watching both movies. But i guess Attack Of The Clones didn't made me snore that much.

on 2/13/2012

Attack of the Clones is better than all 3 POTC films.

on 5/26/2012

Awful acting and atrocious dialogue VS. Bloated piece of crap with zero logic. I agree with Showtimebr, at least Attack of the Clones didn't feel like endless torture.

on 5/26/2012

Clones wasn't great....but compared to Pirates 3....it's f'in Citizen Kane...

on 5/26/2012

Yeah, I'm going with Attack of the Clones.

on Apr 17

Sure, Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End is incomprehensible garbage, but...actually, I can't think of anything to say in its defense. Wait, Keira Knightley did look pretty cute in her little pirate outfit. There, I knew I could find something positive to say about the movie. I'm still choosing Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones, though. Yes, its acting was subpar, and the writing was cringe-worthy; but at least I could keep track of what the hell was going on in the story.

on Apr 17

Pirates 3...I actually really like it.