Saw II vs. Saw

0 comments

10 comments

on 9/17/2009

this is a tough 1... Saw 2 is one of my fav sequels of all time... but all in all, I think the experience of watching Saw was far greater than that of Saw 2... so I vote Saw

on 7/24/2010

Saw II sucked compared to Saw. The sequel didn't really do much right.

on 10/4/2010

Saw II is a pretty good sequel but the original wins hands down.

JRM
JRM

on 10/22/2011

Saw II was good, just not as good as the original.

on 1/28/2012

Cary Elwes > No Cary Elwes

on 1/3/2013

The original takes it out with flying colours.

on 6/21/2014

Saw is better, the sequels disappointing compared

on 6/21/2014

Saw II is probably the best of the Saw sequels (I haven't seen Saw 3D yet, but I'm not expecting anything good), but it's still kind of mediocre. It has its moments, but the first one is easily the best (even though its climax kind of ruined it for me)

on 6/28/2014

You haven't missed anything by not seeing Saw 3D yet, dude. It's almost as non-sensical as IV and V. Only thing it has going for over those two is that it's actually a fast paced movie, if retardedly at that. Anyways, Saw II was the only good Saw sequel (though VI wasn't too bad), but the original wins easily.

on 6/28/2014

*it's actually a FUN movie (not fast paced). Well, it kinda is fast paced. But even in spite of being fun and fast paced, it's pretty terrible