Sign In Now ► or Create A New Account ►
1 comments
4 comments
Rank This Matchup or Comment/Reply Below
on 8/30/2011
Arnold beats the useless remake by a ton. Even with CGI and $90 million dollars, 2011's Conan is nothing but a video game movie with repetitive and thus dull action sequences.
on 11/9/2011
Both movies have dull acting, but Arnold is more than acting. Arnold never acts, he just Arnolds his movies. Conan is a fine example of this. Arnold-Conan also has much better cinematography and one of the best soundtracks ever.
on 2/18/2012
Never having seen Arnold's Conan before, I was, therefore, never a fan. I just watched these two together last night as a double feature. It was a lot of boobs and blood to slog through. Anyway, I don't know whether it's just because I have a soft spot for Jason Momoa from his Stargate: Atlantis days, but I slightly preferred the new Conan. Even as I type that, it's hard to think about it beating a movie that features both the Terminator and the voice of Darth Vader. Regardless, it's not really saying much; these two will be near each other somewhere around the middle of my Flickchart.
on 10/31/2013
Both terrible, but Destroyer has Arnie in it.
on 6/17/2015
It's really hard to make a good remake, Nispel ? Arnie beats No Arnie for sure.
on 11/5/2019
Arnold 1982 is way better than Jason Momoa 2011