Sign In Now ► or Create A New Account ►
7 comments
17 comments
Rank This Matchup or Comment/Reply Below
on 4/25/2014
Well I would think about of the squeal could be indead of good, but the first was kind of toragist
It certainly was "toragist".
on 4/30/2014
Amazing Spiderman 2!! It was Awesome!
on 5/3/2014
The Amazing Spider-Man has the slight edge over the sequel... both were immensely enjoyable.
Amazing spider-man 2 is the worst spider-man film. a ridiculous mess, of characters and plot lines that have little to no connective tissue, the green goblins acting was hilarious in all the wrong ways Electro made Jim Carry's Riddler seem restrained. and reasonable. the parent subplot is ridiculous and takes away one of peter's main attributes (every man who stumbled into his powers), was apathetic with the first one, but it wins hands down.
As a big Spider-Man fan I love both movies. It's tough to say but I'd maybe give the edge to Amazing Spider-Man 2.
on 5/4/2014
TAS2 was not a good film. It was beautiful and impressive, but it wasn't good. Why even include Rhino? Complete throwaway of a character. The film never even ended. The extra use of music or rap or whatever it was during the Electro scenes was weirdly contrived and added nothing to the character or his scenes. Just a huge amount of cheese. I loved TAS1, but the sequel wasn't particularly enjoyable. A shame really.
While the sequel was messy.....the characters were much stronger (minus the villains) and I had a real emotional attachment to Gwen and Peter. The second one wins.
on 5/7/2014
TASM 2 was a mess of epic proportions. Kind of hard to believe that something could go that far off the rails. Thank goodness for a cast that gave it their all. Garfield, Stone, DeHaan, and Foxx saved the movie from being unbearable. On the flip side, I loved the first movie, and it's my favorite of all the Spidey films.
on 5/8/2014
God, the sequel was a mess. Such a mess. You can see a good movie in there - take this out, more of that, tweak this character - but it never comes together. Peter's too confident, a Harry/Peter arc deserves its own movie, Electro was...whatever the fuck he was. It feels too long, and yet none of the film's threads get the attention needed to make any of what's happening really matter. I'm a huge Garfield fan and I can appreciate what Webb's trying to do (a modern, pop-flavored Spider-Man series - I can most definitely appreciate that), there was just too much this time around. And I'm not such a geek that I expect these characters to be precisely as they are on the page, but they gotta be more recognizable than this.
on 5/9/2014
The second film is indeed a mess, but still pretty good overall if you ask me. The first one is much better though. These are easily the two best Spidey films so far in my opinion.
on 5/10/2014
the first was pretty good I thought but I thought this was much better a lot more going on in it better characters both have flaws though but over all I prefer the second
on 5/11/2014
Maybe I was a little hard on it. I didn't like Electro at all, but I did like the other performances, even if the characters weren't quite right. It had its moments and hopefully all of the set-up pays off with a sequel where they can take their time. I've seen some people compare it to Batman & Robin. I think that's harsh. I think it's more in line with Spider-Man 3, a movie everyone hated that I liked, but didn't love. I'd probably take it over Amazing Spidey 2. Amazing Spider-Man 2:Me::Arnold:Lila. I like you, but I don't like you-like you.
What's with the Edward Nigma-like villains lately? First Guy Pearce in Iron Man 3 and now Jamie Foxx in AS2.
Oh Sam Raimi how I miss you. These Marc Webb films have been sad, both for different reasons. The Amazing Spider-Man 1 is a soulless studio movie that was utterly idiotic and so tonally uneven that my emotions turned into a big FU at the screen. Everyone was miscast, save Garfield and Stone. Unfortunately, they completely miswrote Peter in the Amazing Spider-Man 1. Then comes the sequel. The Amazing Spider-Man 2 features the most accurate portrayal of Spider-Man in costume to date. It's got his wise-cracks, his energy, and the action scenes are a lot of fun. Unfortunately, Webb is completely incompetent as a director. This movie is even more of a tonal mess than the first Amazing Spider-Man and has no actual plot. Seriously, this film has no overarching plot or drive to th story. It's just a bunch of scenes that happen. Jamie Foxx was miscast as Electro, plus Electro is a complete joke in this movie. Paul Giamatti looks like he is trying to see how much he can get away with. And Sally Field becomes a nurse... for some reason. I give the slight edge to the Amazing Spider-Man 2. While it's a mess of a movie, the light that shines when Spider-Man is in action actually gave me enjoyment. Amazing Spider-Man 1 may be slightly more coherent but it is completely soulless as a movie. And I feel that Garfield and Stone have much more chemistry in the second film than the first.
on 5/16/2014
Both destroyed my inner geek and passion for the character, but number 2 was solid in more ways.
on 8/6/2014
The second one makes the first look great in comparison...which it isn't at all.
on 11/13/2014
I have to say that TASM2 has a very, very slight edge over the first in that the actors were more comfortable with their characters.
on 11/22/2014
The first one...
on 6/30/2015
Part 1 was better
on 3/29/2016
2 gets the edge for expanding on everything that made 1 great
on 5/5/2017
the first Garfield one was very good the 2nd was just ok.
It's amazing how much people likes these two films. Amazing Spider-Man is a dull, incoherent copy of the first Rahmi film without any character motivation/development and it's edited like a music video from the late 90s/early 2000s. Amazing Spider-Man 2 is just bad on any level.
on 9/13/2017
The first act of Amazing Spider-Man 2 is absolutely atrocious. Both of these movies are worse than the originals.
on 8/18/2021
Amazing spiderman is alright, amazing spiderman 2 is trash
on 11/18/2022
Second film did do some things better than the first, mostly in regards to the action and the Spider-Man costume, but the first film had a much less messy plot, a less worse villain, and was just a bit more better executed overall
on Feb 23
Then I loved the amazing spider-man very much because this is one of my best superhero films of all time and Peppino received a very high rating which I gave because I liked Peppino a lot, much better than the three films of Sam Raimi for the sequel I Amtruly one of the few who can save him but this one isn't even up to the level of the first president So I don't know why they really changed the costume for me the first one was better but that doesn't mean that I didn't like it then the second actually had a plotmessed up it's not even very interesting The mystery of the Parker family but now let's move on to the reasons why this film is not up to the level of the first real film the villains So I always depended on Lizard because I consider him together with Green Goblin from 2002 Dr Octopus the best film villains Ofspider-man, however, the villains in this one from the amazing spider-man 2 are not very interesting so I didn't like electro at all. In fact I didn't even like this villain in other versions he had because he is a character who doesn't really have a good personality Because he complainsalways about anything Which for this reason This is really rejected as bad instead Harry's Goblin Every person hated this bad guy but for me it's good enough as a bad guy the 2002 one won't be good but compared to electro it's made a thousand times better And let's not talk of rhinobecause a character saw no importance in the film you can only see it at the beginning and end of the film for this reason the first film wins and I also show him what the preparation is with the votes the amazing spider-man 10/10 the amazing spider- man 2 7/10
