As soon as the Warner Bros. logo comes up, and the dark foreboding music starts, we understand immediately that The Hangover Part III is going to be nothing like the previous films that came before it. There are laughs to be had, but this time every action will have a consequence, and even our main characters are expendable this time. Director Todd Phillips has taken the characters we know and love and put them in a situation that even they might have regrets about later.
As the story opens, Alan (Zach Galifianakis) is off his meds and out of control, coming to a head with the death of his father (Jeffrey Tambor). Doug (Justin Bartha), Stu (Ed Helms), Phil (Bradley Cooper), and their wives decide that the time has come for an intervention to get him help. They all decide on a place called New Horizons in the middle of the desert.
On the way, they are ambushed by Marshall (John Goodman), a mobster in a jam. The crazy Leslie Chow (Ken Jeong) has escaped from prison in Bangkok and owes Marshall $21 million in stolen gold. Not only does Marshall want it back, but he also believes that the “Wolfpack” has the best chance of finding him. Taking Doug as collateral, Phil, Stu, and Alan have exactly three days to find Chow and bring him in before he kills Doug.
This time the journey will take them from Tijuana, to the Mexican desert, and back to Vegas to track Chow down. As funny as the comedy is, there is a sense of true darkness throughout the entire picture. No one is safe this time, and the risks become increasingly more dangerous as the picture progresses.
Still, as dark as some of these scenes are, there are still many laughs to be had. Phillips keeps a fine balance in keeping this Hangover in check for the most part. Melissa McCarthy steals the show in her two brief scenes, and Alan’s moment with Heather Graham’s baby from the first movie goes from being uncomfortable to touching in less than a minute. It’s a nice touch. It also helps that, like the first film, there is an eclectic mix of music heard on the soundtrack – something that couldn’t be said about Part II.
Unfortunately, the climax leaves something to be desired. The previous installments had natural climaxes that worked well, but considering that this film is being promoted as the “epic finale,” we should expect something more. It’s not as if the climax is anti-climatic, but considering what comes before, you’d expect something much more epic.
Still, the actual finale of The Hangover Part III gives the series some actual closure. Without giving anything away, the ending is smart. Although it gets more serious by its end, Phillips is smart to remind us that his sense of humor has not gone out the window. Just when you think it has, the final scene of the credits satisfies the fans of the first film by showing us just how outrageous it can finally get.
So How Does The Hangover Part III compare to other films directed by Todd Phillips?
The Hangover Part II even at its funniest levels is and will always be a mediocre effort. When you have a film that is exactly the same as its original beat by beat, sometimes it works better (like in the case of Home Alone 2: Lost in New York), but usually it doesn’t. As one call tell, Part III is a big step up from the previous film, so Part III leaves Part II in the dust.
I have a lot of admiration for Road Trip, but even at times one must admit that it is a sophomoric effort from Phillips. The Hangover Part III might be a darker effort than previous Hangover films, but Part III is a stronger effort than Road Trip. Some might disagree with this sentiment, but I’d take a dark journey with the Wolfpack over a journey for a videotape any day of the week.
Old School is a fun good time from beginning to end, with an appealing cast and a lot of funny moments, but oddly enough, the enjoyment factor of Part III is about the same as Old School’s In fact, Jeremy Piven’s character is close to the equal of Leslie Chow in Part III, but Chow is a little more fun than Piven. It’s a close call, but Part III just squeaks by Old School.
This is a tough match-up this time. With Part II, it would be no contest, but with Part III, it presents a different challenge. It almost gives it a kind of a run for its money, but it’s not quite strong enough to overtake it. It seems that because Part III is a darker tale than the film that started this series, it’s appeal might be a little more limited than how I’ve made it sound. The new film is simply not as good as the original, and it’s also not as funny. The streak of Part III ends with the original Hangover coming out the victor.
So where does The Hangover Part III end up on my Flickchart?
The Hangover Part III ranks #1298 out of 3775 movies on my Flickchart. While not quite as good as the original, it’s a huge step-up from the last one. Despite how dark it might get at times, those not expecting much will be rewarded with a lot of surprising laughs throughout.
Some movies can’t catch a break.
The Natalie Portman-starring Western Jane Got a Gun has seemingly been cursed from day one. First, director Lynne Ramsay inexplicably dropped out of the film on the first day of production. Then Jude Law bowed out as the film’s villain because he had signed on just to work with Ramsay.
But now, events completely separate from the production have forced Cooper to bow out as well.
Cooper has been filming David O. Russell‘s next film, American Hustle, for the past few weeks, but when the bombings in Boston delayed that film’s production schedule, a conflict arose. Now Cooper will be unable to shoot Jane Got a Gun because of his commitment to Russell’s Hustle.
Is it time to finally throw in the towel? With major miracles having happened already for the independent production, maybe it can happen again. Apparently, Portman and the film’s other producers are back to looking at a shortlist of actors who could take the role. Among the contenders: Jake Gyllenhaal, Tobey Maguire, Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Tom Hiddleston.
Whoever is chosen would play the leader of a roughneck gang who comes to kill the estranged husband (Noah Emmerich) of Portman’s title character. Jane turns to a former lover (Joel Edgerton) to help protect herself and her farm.
via Cinema Blend
In the wake of having to find an emergency replacement director in Gavin O’Connor, star Natalie Portman and the other producers of independent film Jane Got a Gun were thrown another blow when Jude Law backed out of the film’s villain role. Now, they’ve pulled off another miracle, having gotten Bradley Cooper to replace Law.
Just days away from the Academy Awards ceremony in which they are both up for Oscars for their work on Silver Linings Playbook, it has been announced that director David O. Russell and actress Jennifer Lawrence will team up again. Russell has signed on to direct Lawrence in The Ends of the Earth, a “fact-based love story about a powerful oil tycoon who has everything stripped from him after he is caught in an affair.” The script for The Ends of the Earth is from Argo screenwriter Chris Terrio.
This will mark Russell’s third collaboration with Lawrence, as she is slated to have a cameo appearance in his next film, an as-yet-untitled drama starring Bradley Cooper, Christian Bale and Amy Adams, which is due to begin filming in March. Russell will likely take on The Ends of the Earth after this next project is completed.
Silver Linings Playbook is up for 8 Academy Awards, including Best Picture, Best Director and Best Adapted Screenplay for Russell, Best Actress for Lawrence, and Best Actor for Cooper. It is currently ranked #10 among 2012 films on Flickchart.
“Why is he splitting them up?”
“Why are they so long?”
“Why must he take something we love and ruin it?”
No these are not reviews for The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey. They were the assumed reaction of the tens of people who read Part 1 of my 2012 wrap up; where I dissected the year of Channing Tatum, had two Lincolns square off, and looked at one of the two live action Snow White adaptations. Part 2 will start with…
2 Films, 20 Dwarfs
Snow White and the Huntsman featured Chris Hemsworth as a hunter whose prey is apparently trees since his weapon of choice is an axe, and Kristen Stewart as a Snow White who went to the distinguished school of parted lip acting. There’s a love triangle that nobody cares about – and I’m not talking about director Rupert Sanders, K. Stew, and R. Patt – and Charlize Theron acting with as much subtly as a nuclear explosion. The dwarfs were entertaining but tragically underused.
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey was what I expected. It’s similar to The Lord of the Rings trilogy in a lot of ways but is not as good as any of them. Where we came to know and love every character in that series we only really get to know Bilbo, Gandalf, and Thorin in this. Meanwhile there are a mess of other dwarfs that are only distinguishable by variations of hair above the neck, and sometimes that doesn’t even do enough to make them stand out. Did it need to be a trilogy? No. Is the book being dragged through the mud? More like dropped in a puddle before quickly being grabbed and dried off quickly. As long as fans of The Lord of the Rings series don’t go into it expecting it to be world shattering they should enjoy themselves. I should mention I didn’t see it in 48fps but I heard mostly negative things about it.
And the Winner Is: The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey - even though Peter Jackson obviously thinks “dues ex machina” is Latin for giant eagles.